Data and Dice
  • Tournaments
  • CoK-2025
  • Army Reviews
  • Contact
Reading: 2024 US Masters Kings of War Tournament Recap: Ogres Dominate, Twilight Kin Shine
Share
Data and DiceData and Dice
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Tournaments
  • CoK-2025
  • Army Reviews
  • Contact
Follow US
Copyright @2024 Data & Dice
Data and Dice > Blog > Tournaments > 2024 US Masters Kings of War Tournament Recap: Ogres Dominate, Twilight Kin Shine
Tournaments

2024 US Masters Kings of War Tournament Recap: Ogres Dominate, Twilight Kin Shine

By Trevor
Last updated: 2024-09-05 1:10 pm
By Trevor
Share
13 Min Read
SHARE

The 2024 US Masters Kings of War tournament has concluded, and what an event it was! Congratulations to our champion, Ed Fiske, who showcased exceptional skill and strategy throughout the competition (as well as a lot of entertainment on the Dash28 youtube feed).

Contents
Player PerformanceFaction PerformanceHow to Read the Box PlotMain StorylinesOgres: The Unstoppable ForceTwilight Kin: Synergy is KeyBalanced Newcomers: Northern Alliance and HalflingsWhat Drove Results: Insights from List BuildingConclusion

Player Performance

Below is a table of player performance, including win-loss records and Elo ratings:

PlayerPlayerFactionWinsLossesDrawsAvgScoreElo
Ed FiskeOgres60016.31864
Luke FraserTrident Realm Of Neritica51015.31736
Jeff RadiganNorthern Alliance51013.71718
Justin RobbinsOgres51015.31717
Corey ReynoldsTwilight Kin41114.51707
Andy PattonTwilight Kin41113.01705
Gabe TothDwarfs51015.31701
Cyle PoolGoblins41114.01695
Jeff BodeenOgres41113.01686
Marcelo RoucoThe Order Of The Green Lady42013.21684
Adam BallardNightstalkers42014.21670
Mike SzedlmayerNightstalkers42012.01654
Chet DudickGoblins42013.81641
Travis TimmGoblins42013.31632
Joe BorgeseDwarfs42012.21626
Jesse BerglundTwilight Kin42012.01614
Keith RandallElves42013.01605
Nathan ClevengerNightstalkers42012.21591
Greg PersonDwarfs32111.51587
Richard ComstockEmpire Of Dust42012.21584
Aaron ChapmanThe Order Of The Green Lady32112.71575
Allen BuehnerTwilight Kin32112.31572
Jon MccreadyKingdoms Of Men22210.51549
Derek SennstromHalflings32111.81546
Bart KoehlerNightstalkers32110.71546
George O’ConnellNorthern Alliance33012.71526
Chris PelletierUndead33011.51520
Ray ShieldsRatkin33010.31520
Sean VilmontRiftforged Orcs3309.31519
Dale MotleyThe Order Of The Green Lady33010.51514
Stephen DeroseVarangur33012.51507
John NeesonNightstalkers3309.81505
Donny KroschGoblins2228.81498
Mark CoxNorthern Alliance33010.21495
Bruce MonachUndead3309.31492
Mike RossiDwarfs23111.71484
Jeremy DuvallBasileans33011.01483
Nick ScibettaRiftforged Orcs3308.01480
Paul CravoEmpire Of Dust3309.71473
Harry GarrottFree Dwarfs2319.51472
Rg AllenNightstalkers33010.01469
Cory WalizerOgres3309.21467
Nick MikelonisRatkin3309.31459
Ryan HoffmanBasileans24010.21441
Ben TerschTrident Realm Of Neritica33010.71441
Joey GreekSalamanders2408.81382
Randy DavisDwarfs2407.81381
Justin LengelNorthern Alliance2408.71375
Jose VegaUndead2408.51369
Felix CastroNorthern Alliance2408.51365
Jordan BraunNorthern Alliance2408.51364
Danny JohnsonNorthern Alliance2408.81363
Keith MonachAbyssal Dwarfs2408.21360
Nathan CerroneNightstalkers2407.51356
Austin HowellUndead2407.71352
Jesse GarrettForces Of The Abyss1416.01327
Blake RobertsonForces Of The Abyss1416.21325
Devlin SmithHalflings1418.31323
Garrett MercierAbyssal Dwarfs1506.71285
Kyle RitcheyOgres1507.21257
James GreenmanOgres1505.51252
Matthew TempleGoblins1505.81239
Marshall TempleNoble Undead1505.21224
Adam MarcurellaElves0604.51133
2024 US Masters Results–full file for downloadDownload

For those unfamiliar, Elo is a rating system commonly used in chess and other competitive games. It calculates a player’s relative skill level based on their performance against other rated players. In my calculations, I used a k-factor of 32 and straight win-loss-draw results without weighting. To refine the results, I ran 10 iterations, gradually decreasing the k-value with each iteration to stabilize the results.Â

Faction Performance

Let’s take a look at how different factions fared in the tournament:

FactionWinsLossesDrawsWinPctAvgScoreElo
Twilight Kin15630.62513.01650
The Order Of The Green Lady10710.55612.11591
Trident Realm Of Neritica8400.66713.01589
Dwarfs161220.53311.71556
Kingdoms Of Men2220.33310.51549
Goblins151230.50011.21541
Ogres201510.55611.11541
Nightstalkers231810.54810.91541
Empire Of Dust7500.58310.91529
Varangur3300.50012.51507
Riftforged Orcs6600.5008.71499
Ratkin6600.5009.81490
Free Dwarfs2310.3339.51472
Basileans5700.41710.61462
Northern Alliance192300.45210.11458
Halflings4620.33310.11435
Undead101400.4179.21433
Salamanders2400.3338.81382
Elves4800.3338.81369
Forces Of The Abyss2820.1676.11326
Abyssal Dwarfs3900.2507.41322
Noble Undead1500.1675.21224

How to Read the Box Plot

  • The height of the box (IQR) gives you an idea of the spread or variability of Elo ratings for each faction. A taller box means the Elo ratings are more spread out.
  • The position of the median line within the box tells you about the skewness of the data:
    • If the median is closer to the bottom, the data is skewed towards higher Elo values.
    • If it’s closer to the top, the data is skewed towards lower Elo values.
  • The length of the whiskers shows how far the Elo ratings extend outside the IQR. Long whiskers mean the data has more extreme values.

Main Storylines

Ogres: The Unstoppable Force

The Ogres proved to be a dominant force in this year’s tournament. As predicted by the Countercharge podcast, the Ogres were indeed a major threat to win, and win they did!

Ed Fiske, our champion, went undefeated with a perfect 6-0 record using Ogres. Another Ogre player, Justin Robbins, went 5-1, only losing (from what I’m told) due to clocking out after a long hiatus from the game. The faction’s great scoring units were a key factor in their success, as I’ll talk about a bit further below.Â

It’s worth noting that two less experienced Ogre players went 1-5, which somewhat skewed the overall faction statistics. If you take those two out, the faction went 18-5-1, clearly on the top of the heap.Â

Twilight Kin: Synergy is Key

Twilight Kin, with their recently updated rules, had an excellent showing. While their raw numbers might not immediately stand out, the faction’s synergies allowed skilled players to truly shine. This raises an interesting question: Are Twilight Kin too powerful now? The tournament results suggest they’re highly competitive without being overwhelmingly dominant. The combination of rules-heavy auras/synergies make them tough to master but even tougher to face if you’re not getting regular reps against this. Will the RC nerf them as a result? It’s tough to say.

Balanced Newcomers: Northern Alliance and Halflings

Both Northern Alliance and Halflings, having undergone recent rule updates, performed solidly mid-pack. This indicates that the new rules have successfully balanced these factions, making them competitive without pushing them into overpowered territory.

It’s worth noting that Pack Hunters from the Northern Alliance were one of the most popular unit choices in the tournament. Despite their popularity, they didn’t propel Northern Alliance to the top spots. The RC will need to consider whether any adjustments are necessary for this popular unit, or whether they’re simply a solid pick in a fun list–good, but not overpowered.

What Drove Results: Insights from List Building

My analysis of pre-tournament factorsrevealed some interesting insights into what contributed to player success. To find the relationships between these factors and Elo scores, I first applied linear regression, then explored more flexible models like polynomial regression. The R-squared and MSE weren’t suggesting a good model–which is good news, because it does suggest that tabletop play, rather than listbuilding, is the differentiating factor. I played around with a few statistical models, and ultimately, I found Random Forest to be the best model for predicting Elo scores, but frankly it wasn’t great, either.Â

Here’s a summary of the findings:

  1. Number of Scoring Units: The most crucial factor, accounting for nearly 25% of the predictive model’s importance. Armies focused on objective play had a significant advantage (here’s to you, Ogres and Goblins).Â
  2. Nerve Pool: Army resilience was the second most important factor (just over 20%), highlighting the value of durability in the current meta.
  3. Unit Strength: Again, this points to the value of playing the scenario as opposed to simply winning combats.
  4. Total Ranged Attacks: Shooting armies had slightly better success than non-shooting, though the results were pretty minor.Â
  5. Item Points: While less impactful than army composition, investment in magical items and artifacts still contributed to player performance. My guess is that this goes back to the Gladiator vs Bricklayer concept: adding, e.g., Sharpness or Strength on an already-strong unit created even stronger gladiators. 

Conclusion

The 2024 US Masters Kings of War tournament showcased the evolving meta of the game, with Ogres and Twilight Kin making strong showings while newly updated factions found their footing. As the competitive scene continues to develop, I look forward to seeing how players adapt their strategies and army builds in response to these results.

Did you attend the tournament or have thoughts on the results? I’d love to hear your perspective in the comments below!

You Might Also Like

Evaluating Unit Cost-Effectiveness in Kings of War: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Elo Ratings for the CoK 2025 Updates

Kings of Warfare III: A Comprehensive Tournament Analysis for 2024 Kings of War Meta Trends

2024 Australian Masters Post-Tournament Analysis

Understanding Power Concentration in Kings of War Lists: A New Analytics Approach

2024 Australian Kings of War Masters: Faction Analysis, Meta Trends, and Top Lists Breakdown

TAGGED: CompetitiveGaming, EloRating, FactionAnalysis, kings of war, KingsOfWar2024, kow, ListBuildingStrategy, OgreDominance, TableTopWargaming, tournament, TournamentRecap, TwilightKinRise, us masters, USMasters
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
What do you think?
Love2
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
2 Comments 2 Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending Stories

Army Reviews

How to Dominate with Abyssal Dwarfs: Clash of Kings 2024 Edition

2023-12-29
Tournaments

Faction Diversity at the 2024 US Masters: A Deeper Dive into List Variety

2024-08-18
CoK-2024

Unveiling the Six Archetypes of Kings of War Armies: Part I

2024-09-21
CoK-2024

Decoding Unit Efficiency in Kings of War: A Dual-Method AnalysisÂ

2023-12-17
Book Reviews

“Tales Of Pannithor: Pride Of The King” – A Gripping Kings of War Fantasy Epic That Transcends Its Tabletop Origins

2024-02-17
CoK-2024

Which Kings of War toys are most expensive?

2023-07-24
Data and Dice

Copyright @2024 Data & Dice

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?